Liberal Shame

Liberals ashamed of their weak position on terrorism.
Solution?
Demand Rove either apologize to them or resign.

Karl Rove, in a speech Wednesday evening to the New York state Conservative Party just a few miles north of Ground Zero, said, "Liberals saw the savagery of the 9/11 attacks and wanted to prepare indictments and offer therapy and understanding for our attackers. Conservatives, saw the savagery of 9/11 and the attacks and prepared for war." He also added that the Democratic Party made the mistake of calling for "moderation and restraint" after the terrorist attacks.

Democrats said Thursday that White House adviser Karl Rove should either apologize or resign for accusing liberals of wanting "therapy and understanding" for the September 11 attackers.

So what, exactly, is the problem with the statements made by Rove in a speech to Republican Party members?

I imagine that any who have not been in a deep and mysteriously long sleep have heard the numerous statements from liberals that show what Rove said is not only true, but that he was being a bit too kind in his description as well.

From the top to the bottom of the totem pole Democrats have been lining up to publically proclaim their positions on terrorism. Personally, I wouldn't have been as generous as Rove when describing the left's dangerous denial of a very real threat and petty harping every step of the way in the war on terror. The left has been in a fairly constant state of insane pacifism and obstructionism since 9/11.

Furthermore, the DNC has been caught spooning Rip Van Winkle as not only do they not take terrorism seriously enough, they appear to be hazily confused on the subject of where they stand on fighting terrorism. Since Rove's assessment is correct, I assume Democrats demanding an apology really just don't like Rove's reminding the American people that Democrats are soft (in the head) on terror.

Rove should not apologize because liberals are ashamed of what they stand for and against.